<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[New Quantum Break Claim Sparks Bitcoin Security Debate]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">A researcher has made a small but notable step toward breaking the cryptography that secures Bitcoin, but the claim has already sparked pushback over how meaningful the result really is.</p>
<p dir="auto">Project Eleven said it awarded a 1 BTC “Q-Day Prize” to Giancarlo Lelli for deriving a private key from a public key using a quantum computer.</p>
<p dir="auto">A Tiny Quantum Break, a Big Debate Over What It Proves</p>
<p dir="auto">The test used a 15-bit elliptic curve, far smaller than the 256-bit standard used by Bitcoin and most blockchains.</p>
<p dir="auto">The firm described the result as the largest public demonstration yet of a quantum attack on elliptic curve cryptography. It said the work shows the threat is moving from theory into early execution.</p>
<p dir="auto">However, the scale gap remains large. A 15-bit key has a search space of just over 32,000 possibilities. Bitcoin’s security relies on numbers so large they cannot be brute-forced with current machines.</p>
<p dir="auto">Critics quickly challenged the claim. A community note on the announcement argued the method relied heavily on classical verification, not purely quantum computation.</p>
<p dir="auto">In simple terms, the quantum system may not have done the hardest part of the attack on its own.<br />
<img src="https://r2.coinsori.com/63bd7df6-927d-417b-8714-1086ac07359b.webp" alt="beincrypto_097eec947094b-cbb09d7c93323a1d9e4f7e1684dc4a8a-resized.webp" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /><br />
That distinction matters. True quantum attacks would use Shor’s algorithm to efficiently solve problems that secure digital signatures. Partial or hybrid approaches do not yet prove that capability at scale.</p>
<p dir="auto">Still, the result adds to a pattern. Earlier demonstrations broke even smaller keys. At the same time, research suggests the hardware required to attack real-world cryptography may be lower than previously thought.</p>
<p dir="auto">For Bitcoin, there is no immediate risk. Yet the debate highlights a longer-term issue. Upgrading cryptography across decentralized networks is slow and complex, even if safer alternatives already exist.</p>
<p dir="auto">For now, the takeaway is narrow. Quantum progress is real, but its practical impact remains distant—and contested.<br />
source: <a href="https://www.tradingview.com/news/beincrypto:097eec947094b:0-new-quantum-break-claim-sparks-bitcoin-security-debate/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.tradingview.com/news/beincrypto:097eec947094b:0-new-quantum-break-claim-sparks-bitcoin-security-debate/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://coinsori.com/topic/2964/new-quantum-break-claim-sparks-bitcoin-security-debate</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 22:26:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://coinsori.com/topic/2964.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:44:03 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>